Red Tails Disappoints

As a new-media and social-media guy, you build audience by getting excited about your subject matter and getting the audience excited, too. But you build credibility when you point out the ugly among the good. I really wish that this post wasn’t going to have to be about credibility. Or about ugly. But it is.

I just got home from seeing Red Tails. I had heard that the film had received less than stellar reviews, but I made it a point to avoid others’ opinions and go see the film for myself.

I’m so disappointed. It was like watching a train wreck in slow motion.  Here’s what I saw.

Every character was a mere caricature. Even Cuba Gooding, Jr. was an absolutely, completely, and entirely flat cardboard cutout like the rest of the cast.

The dialogue was unbearably hackneyed. Aircrew saying lines that no aircrew outside of a Hollywood soundstage has ever said or will ever say.

The villain is perhaps the worst caricature of all. You don’t have to squint hard to see the resemblance to Fearless Leader from the Rocky and Bullwinkle Show. I’m not kidding. Complete with dueling scar of the same size, shape, and location on his right cheek. I can’t make up stuff like this. The only thing that they left out was the monocle.

I’m not a customs-and-courtesies maven. But I’m guessing that no CAP cadet who saw some of the salutes rendered in the film (or the timing of some of them) would have been able to keep his or her cookies down. Maybe the salute or the appropriate places and times for salutes were different in Italy in World War II. But I don’t think so.

They even got the guitar wrong. The guitar is strummed by thumb with open hand with downstrokes only, but (a) the right hand clearly never makes contact with the strings and (b) the overdubbed guitar is being strummed both up and down with the backs of the fingers on the downstroke and the back of the thumb on the upstroke. Strangely, at least the left hand looked semi-normal. It might even have saved the guitar sequences had the guitar playing actually started and stopped in synch with the overdub.

Not one story line was compelling. Not even the “we’ll stay with the bombers” thread. Every single story line seemed made up on the spot in the scene in which it first appeared and begged the viewer to lay the foundation by some sort of moviegoing time travel that the director and screenwriter couldn’t be bothered with. It’s as though Christopher Paolini wrote the screenplay.

And I haven’t even gotten to the flying sequences. So let’s get to the flying sequences.

The in-cockpit footage was astonishingly bad. None of the pilots moved or reacted in turns or other maneuvers in a way that looked even remotely real. The green-screen horizon merely moved in the background as they sat straight up or head-faked a lean that bore no resemblance to the actual reaction of a pilot under those inertial circumstances. And, to make matters worse, the most dramatic grunting and straining happened at the most inaccurate times possible (such as grunting and shouting on the float over the top of a loop or Immelman, at which time the pilot is generally experiencing near-zero G).

We live in the age of the GoPro Hero camera. Even a knucklehead like me can shoot compelling in-cockpit video and then watch it to see what pilots actually look like under G and in turns, pulls, pushes, slips, and skids. How difficult could it have been to shoot some face-on cockpit video (or just do some of the most elementary browsing on the Internet), pay attention, and come up with some realistic instructions for the actors? Who did the technical consulting on this film? Do I even want to know?

The pièce de résistance of Lucas thumbing his nose at Newton, Bernoulli, and North American Aviation is the final scene in which a four-ship of P-51s comes in low over the presentation on the ramp and then pulls into the vertical. And holds it for an impossibly long time. I presume that, after the fade to black, there was a formation tailslide the precision and coordination of which has never been seen before or since. Or the loss of four P-51s and most of the assembled company on the ramp. I suppose that the formation might have been looping, but it seemed to me that the upline continued in the vertical and that, even if the formation was looping, it had inadequate energy at the pull to actually get it all the way around and not impact terrain.

Even the sound was wrong. Every piece of cockpit dialogue was clear and had the acoustics of being spoken in a quiet space with acoustic baffling. But Jug and Mustang cockpits have the acoustics of – well – Jug and Mustang cockpits. They’re loud as hell. There’s no way that normal speech caught by a mic in a mask that’s laying down on the pilot’s shoulder would be that intelligible over that din. And, more to the point, the absence of even a hint of that din made the whole thing look, sound, and feel sterile and disassociated with anything even approaching an airplane cockpit.

There are a couple of instances in which the P-51s throttle up. And you hear the engine as the throttle moves forward. But that’s it. You don’t ever really hear it at any other time. How could a sound designer for a movie that features P-51D Mustangs so utterly fail to incorporate the sound of a Merlin engine into the film? How?

Lucas had an opportunity to accurately show the snap roll and subsequent near-tumble used to cause an Fw 190 to overshoot, thus allowing the P-51 to stitch the Fw 190 diagonally with guns as it overshot. But I’m reasonably sure that the pull shown was way too slow for the maneuver and that a pull that slow would simply have resulted in a mere loop or Immelman entry instead of the immediate stall and autorotation that is shown onscreen. Any snap roll that I’ve ever heard of requires a much more rapid pull to force the stall quickly and start the autorotation.

The exterior aerial scenes were awful in their own ways. I did like the wide shots of the furball in progress. That was cool. But that’s only because there was too much going on for the bothersome details to show up. I’m sure that at least one of the aircraft has the tail number THX 1138. Me, I’m hoping that some hero CGI animator snuck in an easter egg on the belly of a bomber that reads “Han shot first.”

Has anyone else noticed that every turn seemed flat and skidded? I have it on good authority that most P-51s were equipped with ailerons. But the P-51s in Red Tails skidded around every turn in ways that made it seem that the ailerons were shimmed to half-effectiveness. It might just be my eye and I’ve only seen the film once. But I’m pretty sure that there was a lot of skidding.

The Me 262s in the movie mixed it up with the P-51s in dogfights. In fact, the Luftwaffe attacked bomber streams almost exclusively by using diving and slashing attacks. Me 262s were few and precious to the Luftwaffe and the Luftwaffe didn’t risk them in slow, turning dogfights. The tremendous speed advantage of the Me 262 made it unnecessary for them to go after American fighters. They simply streaked in through the fighter escort cloud and unloaded their four 30mm cannons on the bombers. Why would an Me 262 pursue American fighters if their objective was actually to attack the bomber stream and their speed advantage permitted them to do so with relative impunity? Yet the Red Tails Me 262s are there on the screen chasing down (and then strangely not overshooting ) P-51s.

These are just my impressions a few hours after walking out of the theater. I didn’t take notes. I didn’t expect that I’d need to take notes because I had no idea going in that I’d feel compelled to write this blog entry. You should feel free to send me hate mail or leave comments here on the blog. I’m sure that I’ve screwed up something. But also pretty sure that I’m right about most of this.

I’m glad that people remember and honor the Tuskegee Airmen. I’ve met more than my share and these men deserve a great deal of praise. The 332nd Fighter Group’s deeds stand on their own, far beyond any poor ability of anyone else to style, characterize, or flavor.

Aviation needs its heroes. Aviation needs all the exposure that it can get in every medium possible. We desperately need another Top Gun to inspire both us and the next generation. For all of the above reasons, I wanted very much to find some basis for praising Red Tails.

There is no basis of any kind upon which to praise this movie. It’s awful. I groaned involuntarily and audibly several times. I couldn’t help myself. It was one of the most uncomfortable experiences I’ve ever had in a theater. It’s so bad in so many ways that it’s simply unwatchable. I only stayed because I was with my brother-in-law and my son and I held out some hope that they were having a good time and were not picking up on what I was seeing.

If news broke tomorrow that Lucasfilm had inadvertently released a rough cut and it turned out that what I saw in the theater tonight was one of those rough cuts, I would completely believe that news. Except that the acting was also so awful that not even a re-cut of the film could have made it into anything approximating what I’d expect from Lucasfilm (at least the Lucasfilm of old).

The last insult on top of injury is that Red Tails occupies a space in the rhythm of movie opportunities that might have been occupied by a better film. The last time there was adequate funding, interest, and market for a feature-length drama about the Tuskeegee Airmen was in 1995 when HBO produced Tuskegee Airmen, starring Laurence Fishburne. It has taken these past 16 years to get to the point where there’s enough interest to support another film. Even so, George Lucas invested $58 million of his own money into making the film.

It’ll be at least another decade – maybe two – before the market is ready for another Tuskegee feature film. And this was probably the last opportunity to have a Tuskegee movie on theater screens while actual Tuskegee airmen still live and breathe. Lucas shot this cycle’s only wad on Red Tails.

Before getting up out of my seat in the theater, I tweeted “I cant begin to say how disappointed I am after seeing Red Tails. I’m so very, very sorry.” So now I’ve begun. And I am most deeply sorry that the film ended up being what it is. I was really excited to see it. Perhaps that added to the disappointment.

It is probably impolitic to criticize Red Tails. Most aviation media have been frothing at the mouth for months over the impending release and running all kinds of excited features.  I expect hate mail. There was such a swell of enthusiasm in the aviation community about it that I feel like a heretic in actually putting these observations out there. But I’m pretty sure that any pilot who saw the film is thinking what I’m thinking. It’s a painful exercise in credibility to actually say it. But I’m saying it.

 

About Steve Tupper

Stephen Force is the superhero alter ego of mild-mannered tech and aviation lawyer, commercial pilot (glider, with private privileges in ASEL, ASES, AMEL, IA, and DC-3 (SIC) type-rated), and Civil Air Patrol lieutenant colonel Steve Tupper. Steve writes, records, and brings you the inside story about everything that really matters in aviation. He's flown with the USAF Thunderbirds, he's and airshow performer and air boss, and he's one of only five pilots ever to earn a FAST card in the glider category. Follow Steve's ongoing quest to do all that is cool in aviation at www.airspeedonline.com or on Twitter as @StephenForce.

Comments

  1. I’m a little surprised to see you so disappointed in Red Tails. My preview post about the movie shared my concern that the film was gonna be exactly as you feel it is, but that means I had very low expectations for the movie going in (based on the trailers I had seen). http://airpigz.com/blog/2012/1/20/the-tuskegee-airmen-and-their-red-tails-in-theaters-today-wi.html

    I held back on being all excited about it because I was afraid it would do a disservice to the Tuskegee Airmen. And while I feel it’s far from the film it should have been, especially with the resources of Lucas behind it, I found it to be quite acceptable.

    Technically, it’s a horrible mess, but enough other elements were in place in my opinion to make an entertaining film based on extraordinary true events, and most important, the courageous Tuskegee Airmen were clearly and effectively honored… especially in the eyes of George’s intended audience: teenage boys.

    Sleep on it. maybe you’ll feel better about it tomorrow : )

  2. I agree with Martt, I had actually expected them to make a mess of the technical aspects. The one thing that jumped out at me by the way was that every time one of those 100mph landing, tailwheel aircraft touched down they had a wingman within 40 or 50 feet. I doubt that was SOP. To give the acting credit I will say the scenes where the colonel was dealing with bigotry in DC were very inspiting, along with his handling of the pilots. Go to the movie to enjoy seeing P51s (OK, fake ones) streak across the sky and dominate anything it comes in contact with.

  3. Stephen, I too was disappointed in this movie that I had the highest hopes for. You just said it a whole lot better than I ever could.

  4. Maj Howard Morris says:

    Steve, your comments were exactly right on. EXACTLY my sentiments and a few more.

  5. Randy Walberg says:

    Steve, you summarized my thoughts exactly, almost to the detail. Six of us went together and had a hard time even talking about it afterward. Too bad such an inspiring story was so badly treated.

  6. Right on, Steve. I also was extremely disappointed in Red Tails. Even if you forget entirely about the flying part, a story that should have been inspiring was anything but. It was way too formulaic, including the contrived love story and the death of the hero… Quite a few of the things that really felt forced should have been dropped to make way for the actual story – The real story is quite compelling, and here they simply dropped the ball in telling it. Epic fail.

  7. Mike Gentile says:

    The P-51 was always overated. The FW-190E was as Chuck Yeager said was just as good.

    • Funny how quotes take on a life on their own. The quote I heard attributed to Yeager was, “I’ve flown all the single engine prop fighters and the P-51 was the best”. He was supposed to be refering to the fact that he test flew all the captured fighters after the war. Wonder which quote is accurate, and by the way, if you ever get a chance to get a ride in one of those over rated 51s and want to pass it up call me, I’ll crawl across broken glass to get there.

    • John Bucko says:

      The P-51 had to fly 600 miles , maybe more one way, so lots of extra fuel and tankage on board, even after dropping the tanks. The 50 caliber MG’s were heavy at 64 lbs each plus feed and mounting + ammo . The FW -190 was a good fighter, but like the Spitfire, it lacked the range and pilots were in the cockpit 2-1/2 hours at most, before landing & refueling for another go round. Also, with the exception of the jet ME 262′s, every German prop fighter in the movie was an ME-109. No FW-190′s noted in the movie. Advanced in 1937, the 109 was current in 1940-43, it was dated by the end of the war aerodynamically and only powerful engines kept its performance close to the Mustang. Like the FW-190, the 109 had limited flight time and used a centerline auxilliary fuel tank to chase bombers across European skies for a couple hundred miles.

  8. I saw the movie as a non-pilot. Please explain how would they be able to tell the story if some dramatic license wasn’t used. You mentioned the cockpit noise would have been extremely loud and they couldn’t have been heard if the masks were down. That would have ben a fun movie to watch, imperceptible dialogue, and realist sound. As non pilot, I looked for the story of the men, not the exact portrayal of the aircraft. Showing the planes landing as they did was unrealistic, I concede, but how do you portray real air ops in a realist fashion? The planes would be so far apart you couldn’t see them if they were shown in realistic scale, and maneuvers. Probably for nit picking pilots this movie was junk. But for an audience member that just wanted to see the story, it was fine. I agree that the Hero and the love interest was a little hokey, and the prisoner thing was probably very understated, and maybe conjured. But the dramatic effect of the story was not overstated. Those men did suffer a lot of racist hate, and yet they did contribute, in no small, way to the war effort. That story need to be told, even if it had to use some dramatic license about airplanes and air ops to do it. Many Americans, Black and White, don’t know this story. If they need historical facts, they are available to right the wrongs of cinematic story telling. Give the Red Tails a break! They deserve to be honored.

  9. I have a technical question that I am very curious about. In the movie, the Red Tails supposedly shot down an ME-262 Jet Fighter. Is that true? Did any American pilot shoot down an ME-262? If so, how many?
    Thank you

  10. Allied kills of M2 262 were uncommon, but not unheard of. Most were accomplished while the Me 262 was taking off or landing – phases of flight in which the 262 was vulnerable. I found an ostensible summary of Me 262 kills at http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.military/msg/c5eb8f78f05b8c6a?pli=1. I haven’t vetted any of the information, but it’s a start.

    Long story short, few or no kills occurred in the way shown in Red Tails. As stated in the post, 262s didn’t engage Allied fighters in slow turning fights. They engaged in slashing attacks, similar to the tactics used by P-51s and F-4Us against Japanese Judys and Zeroes in the pacific and by F-4s against MiGs in Vietnam. If you have a material speed and power advantage – as in those cases – it makes no sense to engage directly. Dive in, slash, climb away, repeat.

    • Thanks again Steve!

      This is the type of information I have been looking for. I made a simple comment on a Youtube trailer about this movie being inspiring and needing to be told, and you wouldn’t believe the hate, vitriol and language that was used against me and the Tuskegee Airmen… I was called a “nigger loving lying Jew” (and I’m not Jewish by any stretch, but how would they know?) and a lot of other things for a simple congratulatory post. I was really taken aback by the intensity and vulgarity of the attacks. One jerk from Canada even started slamming US airmen with unbelievably horrendous language and spite. No one seems to be on the fence about this movie, they either enjoyed it, or hated it, with no middle ground afforded. I started to dig for facts after those attacks, to either prove them wrong, or myself wrong. I can deal with facts whether they support or upend my posi